<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
>

<channel>
	<title>FABOO MAMA &#187; feb. 5th</title>
	<atom:link href="http://faboomama.com/tag/feb-5th/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://faboomama.com</link>
	<description>Inside the mind of an opinionated mama...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 05:22:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/</creativeCommons:license>
		<item>
		<title>CALIFORNIA BALLOT:  No on Prop. 97</title>
		<link>http://faboomama.com/2008/01/23/california-ballot-no-on-prop-97/</link>
		<comments>http://faboomama.com/2008/01/23/california-ballot-no-on-prop-97/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anika Malone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california ballot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feb. 5th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prop. 97]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faboomama.wordpress.com/2008/01/23/california-ballot-no-on-prop-97/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Proposition 97 is similar to Props. 94, 95 &#38; 97.  This one focuses on the Agua Caliente Band. I still say No on this propostion. Now, I know that Propositions 94 &#8211; 97 will more than likely pass.  The opponents are talking about Slot Machines, I&#8217;m looking at the possible (probable?) environmental impact and the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://faboomama.com/2008/01/23/california-ballot-no-on-prop-97/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/</creativeCommons:license>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>CALIFORNIA BALLOT:  No on Prop. 96</title>
		<link>http://faboomama.com/2008/01/23/california-ballot-no-on-prop-96/</link>
		<comments>http://faboomama.com/2008/01/23/california-ballot-no-on-prop-96/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anika Malone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california ballot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feb. 5th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prop. 96]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faboomama.wordpress.com/2008/01/23/california-ballot-no-on-prop-96/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Similar to Props. 94 and 94, with a focus on the Sycuan Band down in San Diego.  They only want to add 3000 more slot machines, but everything remains the same. Nope.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://faboomama.com/2008/01/23/california-ballot-no-on-prop-96/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/</creativeCommons:license>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>CALIFORNIA BALLOT:  No on Prop. 95</title>
		<link>http://faboomama.com/2008/01/23/california-ballot-no-on-prop-95/</link>
		<comments>http://faboomama.com/2008/01/23/california-ballot-no-on-prop-95/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anika Malone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california ballot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feb. 5th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prop. 94]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faboomama.wordpress.com/2008/01/23/california-ballot-no-on-prop-95/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Proposition 95 is the same as Prop. 94 except it benefits the Morongo Band a little further north.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://faboomama.com/2008/01/23/california-ballot-no-on-prop-95/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/</creativeCommons:license>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>CALIFORNIA BALLOT:  No on Prop. 94</title>
		<link>http://faboomama.com/2008/01/22/california-ballot-no-on-prop-94/</link>
		<comments>http://faboomama.com/2008/01/22/california-ballot-no-on-prop-94/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 03:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anika Malone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california ballot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feb. 5th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prop. 94]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faboomama.wordpress.com/2008/01/22/california-ballot-no-on-prop-94/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Proposition 94 is called the Slot Machine Proposition. I call it the Tribes Get to Bend the Rules Again Proposition. I vehemently opposed these Indian gaming propositions. Since the idiot voters of CA approved these casinos, the tribes have gotten greedier and greedier, and frankly, all those promises of what the money will do hasn&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://faboomama.com/2008/01/22/california-ballot-no-on-prop-94/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/</creativeCommons:license>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>CALIFORNIA BALLOT:  No on Prop. 93</title>
		<link>http://faboomama.com/2008/01/22/california-ballot-no-on-prop-93/</link>
		<comments>http://faboomama.com/2008/01/22/california-ballot-no-on-prop-93/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 02:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anika Malone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california ballot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feb. 5th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prop. 93]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faboomama.wordpress.com/2008/01/22/california-ballot-no-on-prop-93/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Proposition 93 is a term limit proposition. Again?  Yeah.  Again.  Personally, I thought this is just another stupid proposition, but then I paid attention to the language: Reduces the total amount of time a person may serve in the state legislature from 14 years to 12 years. Allows a person to serve a total of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://faboomama.com/2008/01/22/california-ballot-no-on-prop-93/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/</creativeCommons:license>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>CALIFORNIA BALLOT:  No on Prop. 92</title>
		<link>http://faboomama.com/2008/01/22/california-ballot-no-on-prop-92/</link>
		<comments>http://faboomama.com/2008/01/22/california-ballot-no-on-prop-92/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 02:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anika Malone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california ballot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feb. 5th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prop. 92]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faboomama.wordpress.com/2008/01/22/california-ballot-no-on-prop-92/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Proposition 92 is an interesting one. The gist is that it sets a lower fee per unit at Community Colleges.  There was an uproar a few years back when CC fees went up to $26/unit in some cases.  This proposition wants to set it at $15/unit.  Perspective:  When I went to CC back in &#8217;90 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://faboomama.com/2008/01/22/california-ballot-no-on-prop-92/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/</creativeCommons:license>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>CALIFORNIA BALLOT:  No on Prop. 91</title>
		<link>http://faboomama.com/2008/01/22/california-ballot-no-on-prop-91/</link>
		<comments>http://faboomama.com/2008/01/22/california-ballot-no-on-prop-91/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 01:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anika Malone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california ballot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feb. 5th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prop. 91]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faboomama.wordpress.com/2008/01/22/california-ballot-no-on-prop-91/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Prop. 91 is a largely useless proposition, in that we already have propositions on the book that do what this prop. proposes to do. This proposition, as I understand it, will stop the Governor from raiding the pocketbook of the transportation budget.  This proposition states that all funds earned for transportation usage (roads, highways and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://faboomama.com/2008/01/22/california-ballot-no-on-prop-91/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/</creativeCommons:license>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

